Steph dont you think we want an end to it sometime , Did you not see our proposal when our committee went to the meeting at St Ignatius ? We suggested A groundshare of the Q E with Enfield Town and the athletics people and even the Rugby club to a point . We were (Maybe still are ) hoping to build a clubhouse and a stand on the far side all of which would have been there for everybodys use NOT JUST OURS ! Dont you think a groundshare for a couple of seasons just to see how the land lies could have been a reasonable idea ? Dont forget we are in different leagues it may take a couple of seasons to be in the same division again maybe more . Dont you think we would rather spend money in making a contribution towards a stadium for us all ? rather than pay groundrent elsewhere . I dont think a groundshare is a bad idea it may bring down some of the barriers that exist . Its a sad fact there are many wounds to heal but unless we can come to some sort of arrangment then this could go on for many years more . Thats my suggestion no doubt you will knock it back someway.
To be honest I think you need a reality check on your wishes.
2 teams playing a 'similar' level sharing a ground with one team at present pulling in 250-300 supporters and the other 50-100.
OR one amalgamated team pulling in towards 500ish, sharing the same roots, being EFC, and working together for football in our borough of Enfield.
Nevertheless, I think Paul and our board should leave that olive branch out indefinately, however, I would object if we then progress up a couple of divisions and 1893 did'nt.
However, I wish 1893 all the best, again, but like the others, I think you've made a mistake in your decision making.