What's rubbish? That it's better to deal in facts then what you have read in the papers and assumed was fact?
From day one they have milked this whole sad story,they now have over a million quid in the bank and then sod off back to the UK two days before the portuguese look like pressing charges.
Again, depending what you read, they will not be using this for legal fees (I have also read reports that they will, so again depends which paper has its facts right) and I'd be very surprised if they're able to spend it.
Why did they hire a car a day before going to meet the pope.
One story goes they had relatives and friends needing transport to ferry the twins around. Might just as easily be bullsh!t, all I'm saying is don't just close your eyes to the idea that there are two sides to every story cos you reckon they're guilty.
Why does it look like her d & a has been found
Her "D&A" - which I thought was an opticians - has not been definitely identified as a 100% full match, unless you're going by Sky News's latest report which today's papers picked up on. Which is not fact, and a Portuguese official today stated the evidence was not as conclusive as the UK media had led us to believe.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending them. They were criminally neglectful of their children. I'm not even saying that what you're reporting is untrue or false, but most of what's been said on here and elsewhere could as easily be scurrilous rumour (it's easy to chuck in a few rumours on the internet and everyone instantly believes it). Just because people didn't like the look of them, thought they looked a bit shifty, someone said they're all swingers, etc, etc, it's believed.
They may well have done it, but what I find distasteful from what I've read elsewhere is the amount of amateur detectives pronouncing them guilty before people who actually have a clue conduct a trial. Some people on some forums actually WANT them to be guilty because they don't like them. Personally, I'd rather they were not guilty and that there was still a chance that little girl was alive, however unlikely.
I can't really see how they'd have committed the crime, hid the body in the first place, then moved it and hidden it and left precious little 100% DNA evidence. I certainly can't see how they'd have the sheer mental tolerance to withstand the media, their family and friends, collect a million in fundraising from the public and look everyone in the eye at the end of it.
If they have done that, then it's pretty damned evil in my book, but I won't boil them alive just yet until the actual facts give me a reason to condemn them outright.