Jump to content
Welcome to the new software - Please read! Read more... ×
Fans Focus - Non League football clubs

Recommended Posts

The man makes me absolutely sick !!!

 

He should never be allowed to play football at any level ever ever again.

 

He is a CONVICTED rapist.   END OF..................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was an excellent interview with Sheffield United's Club Community Foundation patron Charlie Webster on Andrew Neil's 'This Week' show on Thursday with resident guests Michael Portillo and Alan Johnson, she said it all about Evans who surely can't be allowed to resume his career at Bramall Lane:

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0299p8v

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was an excellent interview with Sheffield United's Club Community Foundation patron Charlie Webster on Andrew Neil's 'This Week' show on Thursday with resident guests Michael Portillo and Alan Johnson, she said it all about Evans who surely can't be allowed to resume his career at Bramall Lane:

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0299p8v

 

 

I saw that programme, Rhodsey.

 

I thought she put her point across very well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an understatement, she was amazing wasn't she and she's a good looking girl too!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that convicted rapist Ched Evans proposed to his attractive girlfriend Natasha Massey shortly after leaving prison and she happily accepted saying that she is 'over the moon'. It's hard to believe that a woman would stand by such an individual isn't it:

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2818540/Convicted-rapist-Ched-Evans-proposes-girlfriend-two-weeks-walking-free-prison.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shame on Sheffield United for welcoming Evans back to Bramall Lane with open arms, I see that the Club's sexy Community Foundation patron Charlie Webster resigned on the spot when she heard the news.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps Rhodesly is completely unaware of the Blades' Statement yesterday in which they dispel the myth that Ched Evans 'has been welcomed back to the club with open arms' and is merely training there following a request by the PFA.

 

Not the first time, won't be the last that the facts are ignored. Never mind eh?

 

PUBLISHED

17:50 11th November 2014

Sheffield United Football Club acknowledges the public discussion on the potential return of its former player, Mr Ched Evans, to professional football following the completion of the custodial portion of his sentence for rape in the courts of England and Wales. While some have speculated about whether the Club will or should invite Mr Evans to return to SUFC as a registered footballer, the Club is not prepared at this time to decide that issue.

The Club also acknowledges receipt of a request from The Professional Footballers' Association ('The PFA') to the effect that the Club consider allowing Mr Evans, who is a PFA member, to train at the Club's facilities. According to the request, this training would be with a view to enabling Mr Evans to get back to a level of fitness, which might enable him to find employment in his chosen trade. This request has come to the Club, because it is the last club at which Mr Evans was registered before his conviction.

In response to The PFA's request, the SUFC Board of Directors has deliberated the matter internally, taking into consideration:

  • The views of Staff, the Football League, and The PFA; 
     
  • The views of SUFC supporters and the general public as expressed in numerous letters and emails, social media comments, editorials, supporter websites, public petitions and media coverage; and 
     
  • The public statements of:
    • The PFA, declaring that professional footballers should be treated as equals before the law, including in circumstances where they seek to be rehabilitated and to return to work in their chosen trade following periods of incarceration; and 
       
    • Mr Evans, acknowledging the destructive nature of the acts, which led to his conviction, and seeking a chance to be rehabilitated by returning to work in his chosen trade after having completed the custodial portion of his sentence.

In the course of its deliberations, the Board also spoke with Mr Evans and his representatives.

After due consideration, the Board has decided to respond favourably to The PFA's request and to allow Mr Evans to train at the Club's facilities. This decision, which takes effect immediately, is informed by the following four considerations:

  1. The Club condemns rape and violence of any kind against women in the strongest possible terms. More specifically, the Club considers rape, the crime for which Mr Evans was convicted, to be a heinous crime worthy of serious punishment as provided under law. The Club has been assured by Mr Evans that he shares these value judgements. 
     
  2. The Club does not question Mr Evans' conviction for rape. The Club is advised that:
    • The punishment imposed on Mr Evans in connection with his conviction was consistent with applicable law; 
       
    • Mr Evans has completed the custodial portion of his sentence as provided under law, having demonstrated good behaviour while in custody; and 
       
    • Mr Evans has been paroled on licence conditions, which do not restrict him from returning to service in professional football.
    The Club recognises that the same justice system that tried, convicted and punished Mr Evans under law also provides for his rehabilitation under law. 
     
  3. The Club agrees with the recent statements of The PFA, to the effect that professional footballers should be treated as equals before the law, including in circumstances where they seek to return to work following periods of incarceration. The Club rejects the notion that society should seek to impose extrajudicial or post-term penalties on anyone. In a nation of laws, served by an elected parliament and duly constituted courts of law, there can be no place for 'mob justice'. The Club believes that the only penalties following from a conviction on any charge should be those set forth in law and deemed appropriate by a court of competent jurisdiction. 
     
  4. The Club understands that Mr Evans is pursuing legal recourse to clear his name before the Criminal Cases Review Commission and, if permitted, before the appellate courts. The Club recognises Mr Evans' right to appeal and to seek to clear his name as provided under law. The Club, however, takes no view on the merits of, and has no role in, any such appeal. The Club leaves all such matters exclusively to Mr Evans, his legal advisors and the justice system. The Club's decision to allow Mr Evans to train at the Club's facilities is based on the facts as they stand today and is in no way dependent on the perceived merits or outcome of the appeal.

Apart from this statement, the Club will not be making any further comments about this matter for the foreseeable future.

Read more at http://www.sufc.co.uk/news/article/20141111-statement-2078346.aspx#DZol4D83JkfLAZ48.99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A very good statement by the club.

 

It will be interesting to see what happens when Mr Evans has returned to full match fitness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He was convicted in a court of law for what can only be described as a disgusting crime.

Personally, I don't think the sentence was harsh enough.

 

As for playing football again, if he clears his name then okay otherwise you need to look at the severity of the crime and decide if the club really wants to employ someone with that record. I don't think a convicted rapist would be allowed to work where I work, I think it would unsettle the female workers for starters.

 

Yes, there are girls that may try it on, but the clubs should make sure that they drum it into the players that they need to be careful about their behaviour and they are not above the law. I believe that some players feel that they are above the law and can do anything they want knowing the clubs will employ expensive lawyers to get them out of trouble if it comes their way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Times columnist Matthew Syed says society should not be handing out extra-judicial punishment. "Why should we deny a footballer a return to employment if we would not deny a plumber?" Money is a red herring, he argues. "The point here is that the very concept of rehabilitation is undermined if we try to rig the world against those we have already punished. After all, why would anyone wish to change if they know they are never going to be given a decent shot?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Missed Question Time, I know it's repeated though so I'll record it or catch it on iPlayer.

 

In general terms I think it's right to give people second chances in life if they realise they've made a mistake and have learned from it.

Make one mistake when you're young and naïve and it can destroy the rest of your life - that seems harsh to me.

It's the nature of the crime in this instance that unsettles me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The lad has maintained it was consensual, the girl said - basically - that she was too drunk to remember. The case is going to review.

 

Getting a girl insensible and taking advantage of her is rape. Young men, men of all ages and backgrounds may not know this. However, what can young men do to protect themselves? How do they measure if a girl is insensible at the time of consensus - Not waking up the next day. These are I suppose common sense decisions on the one hand or when it comes to it a jury and judge.

 

People say that the difference is in admitting that the person has done wrong, not that he has done the time in prison.

 

150,000 people have signed a petition, several - I think 3 people have cut ties with the club, 3 sponsors have made known their disapprobation.

 

60m odd have not signed a petition, the club still has a board and staff, they have other sponsors who trust the club.

 

Why punish someone with prison and continue to punish them on release? Will he be a continued danger in the workplace? Does no-one deserve a second chance?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The lad has maintained it was consensual, the girl said - basically - that she was too drunk to remember. The case is going to review.

 

Getting a girl insensible and taking advantage of her is rape. Young men, men of all ages and backgrounds may not know this. However, what can young men do to protect themselves? How do they measure if a girl is insensible at the time of consensus - Not waking up the next day. These are I suppose common sense decisions on the one hand or when it comes to it a jury and judge.

 

People say that the difference is in admitting that the person has done wrong, not that he has done the time in prison.

 

150,000 people have signed a petition, several - I think 3 people have cut ties with the club, 3 sponsors have made known their disapprobation.

 

60m odd have not signed a petition, the club still has a board and staff, they have other sponsors who trust the club.

 

Why punish someone with prison and continue to punish them on release? Will he be a continued danger in the workplace? Does no-one deserve a second chance?

This is a very emotive case, and there's valid arguments for both sides. When I was in a position to select new employees I'm fairly certain I would never have considered a rapist as suitable.   When I was a school governor though I successfully fought to have a young teacher employed who had convictions for  shoplifting. Fortunately, she turned out to be a brilliant asset to the school and my judgement proved correct.

 

On a lighter note, in my long past youth it wasn't that unusual to wake up next to some awful dragon  after a night of heavy drinking. As they often asked for second helpings in the morning I can reasonably assume whatever may have happened the night before was definitely consensual. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that Jessica Ennis has entered the fray and said that if Evans is re-employed by the club then she would like her name - as a supporter and sponsor - taken down from a stand at Sheffield United's Stadium. Following which she has been attacked by trolls on Twitter, one calling her a vicious name, another hoping that she get raped. These trolls are despicable. The campaign against the girl in the case has been despicable, whilst I still support the case that re-habilitation includes being allowed to work in your chosen trade and that society does not seek to continue their punishment this case and some of Evan's supporters who have cynically attacked the victim and people honestly expressing opinions are disgusting and should see a term behind bars. If Evans gave his support or helped initiate it should join them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One un-asked question..................

 

IF  he is allowed to return to first class football, he would untimately have access to 'young-fans'.  Would he pass a 'fitnes' check by the police as I assume he is having to sign the 'sex-offenders' register.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Why should we deny a footballer a return to employment if we would not deny a plumber?"

They are two totally different lines of work though, a footballer is hero worshipped for example, a plumber isn't!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are two totally different lines of work though, a footballer is hero worshipped for example, a plumber isn't!

Yes, I think that is something to take into consideration. It is a crying shame that the artisans of our society are not more popular.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be worth a read, bit long but if you want to be informed about the case then I don't see why you couldn't.

 

https://www.crimeline.info/case/r-v-ched-evans-chedwyn-evans

 

I'm completely unsure about the original Judges summing up to the Jury and how the Jury arrived at their verdict. But then I'm not a judge and only ever sat on a jury with a mugging case. 

 

The main point for me is how you can be two and a half times over the drink drive limit at most and not at least know what you are doing, you may not be fit to drive but you are still capable of making decisions, otherwise your perfect appeal if caught driving over the limit would be that you were incapable of making a decision. Two and a half times over the limit is as my memory serves about 5 units of alcohol. Anything up to ten between the ages of 15 to 40 made me perfectly capable of deciding how to get home, whether to buy a kebab, and pizza or fish & chips or whether to allow myself to be seduced by a female, and I'd sure remember that in the morning.

 

Unsafe verdict. I don't know how this lad other than by prudish values was found guilty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure - the expert that estimated the amount of alcohol she had was a defence witness and as such would be biased towards the defence - it sounds like she threw up the alcohol so surely it's hard to judge how much she really drank. As a non-expert, it sounds to me as though she had more than 5 units. I think we can question the memory loss thing though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think maybe you are right CoT, we can't be sure of how much she had to drink, she was certainly falling over drunk as seen on CCTV, however, much later, towards 4.15am she had left her friends and was walking when she met McDonald. I just don't buy the memory loss thing at all. Waking up at 11.30 am in a urine soaked bed all alone, well I'd probably feel a bit miffed if I were a woman remembering who I came with to the hotel but as a bloke I'd have thought most would be content and be thinking of finding breakfast and getting to the pub. I would in all honesty appreciate women's and mens views on that scenario. 

 

What troubles me is this vicious campaign towards the victim online and off by friends and family of Evans, surely if Evans hasn't the influence to stop it considering that they are his friends/family then has he been a part of its initiation.

 

I really don't think he's going to play again for Sheffield United and I seriously doubt that he'll play professional football again but who know?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I think that is something to take into consideration. It is a crying shame that the artisans of our society are not more popular.

With regards to a plumber being able to return to his trade after serving time for rape, my youngest, who has a successful plumbing company thinks not. For a start, if the company sent a rapist to a house, and he raped the occupants they would be sued for putting the victim in danger. Its unlikely any insurance company would pick up the tab, and its unlikely they would get public liability insurance. Secondly, he seems to think a convicted rapist would be barred from having a gas-safe certificate, which would make them virtually unemployable in the plumbing trade. Thirdly, no company that employs people to enter customers premises, that are in their right mind,  would ever employ someone like Ched Evans. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to a plumber being able to return to his trade after serving time for rape, my youngest, who has a successful plumbing company thinks not. For a start, if the company sent a rapist to a house, and he raped the occupants they would be sued for putting the victim in danger. Its unlikely any insurance company would pick up the tab, and its unlikely they would get public liability insurance. Secondly, he seems to think a convicted rapist would be barred from having a gas-safe certificate, which would make them virtually unemployable in the plumbing trade. Thirdly, no company that employs people to enter customers premises, that are in their right mind,  would ever employ someone like Ched Evans. 

Well you live and learn Alan. As I said a while before, rapists should be locked up and the key thrown away, those we are sure of being guilty that is, unsafe verdicts not withstanding. Then we won't have to worry about these things really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think maybe you are right CoT, we can't be sure of how much she had to drink, she was certainly falling over drunk as seen on CCTV, however, much later, towards 4.15am she had left her friends and was walking when she met McDonald. I just don't buy the memory loss thing at all. Waking up at 11.30 am in a urine soaked bed all alone, well I'd probably feel a bit miffed if I were a woman remembering who I came with to the hotel but as a bloke I'd have thought most would be content and be thinking of finding breakfast and getting to the pub. I would in all honesty appreciate women's and mens views on that scenario. 

 

What troubles me is this vicious campaign towards the victim online and off by friends and family of Evans, surely if Evans hasn't the influence to stop it considering that they are his friends/family then has he been a part of its initiation.

 

I really don't think he's going to play again for Sheffield United and I seriously doubt that he'll play professional football again but who know?

 

Like I said before, if he clears his name then I have no problem with him playing again. However, I don't think he will play again either, the stigma surrounding him would prevent that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like Sheffield United have made a u turn and will not be offering rapist Ched Evans a new contrat following his release from prison, good for them however the Bramall Lane outfit should have distanced themselves from Evans from day one which would have avoided all the controversy with the likes of the Club's high profile supporters Jessica Ennis-Hill and Charlie Webster. I'm quite surprised that actor, and huge Blades fan, Sean Bean hasn't spoken up on the issue and demonised Evans in the press: 

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2835884/Rapist-Ched-Evans-not-offered-contract-Sheffield-United-club-chiefs-shocked-public-reaction-toxic-former-striker.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×