Requests for an unregistered ryman forum

[Ian_W]

Hi,

 

I have had requests today for an unregistered ryman forum - but I wondered what you thought. This follows the compulsory registration now on the Ryman forum hosted elsewhere.

 

We have three main choices.

 

1) Stay as we are

2) Go unregistered on the Ryman forum

3) Have a separate Ryman forum that is unregistered with optional registration.

 

Please let em know what you think.

 

Thank you.

[Matt H]

I say have a seperate forum and employ a couple more Moderators who have quite a bit of internet access time available.

[Kevin_Rye]

It'd be nice to be able to post somewhere where threads aren't so regularly deleted by the moderators. Course I understand that people should be wary of slandering etc, but there is a reasonable limit to censorship!

[Uncle Urchin]

Quote:

Kevin_Rye said:
It'd be nice to be able to post somewhere where threads aren't so regularly deleted by the moderators. Course I understand that people should be wary of slandering etc, but there is a reasonable limit to censorship!

its 'people' like you kevin that create the need for moderation and censorship by constantly seeking attention with slanderous and biased posts...

I also think that given your highly paid position at supporters trust you should not really be using these forums for your rhetoric...most posters/fans on here are unpaid for their hard work and efforts whilst you are highly paid by the taxpayers ultimately to do a job in non league football and I doubt your professional remit includes spouting bollox on forums...

<img src="/forum/images/graemlins/bootyshake.gif" alt="" />

non league paper anyone.... <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

[coupwotcoup]

Quote:

Uncle Urchin said:

non league paper anyone.... <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

Not until Sunday.... <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/applaus.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/affig.gif" alt="" />

[Trueblue06]

Could there be an election for the moderators on the various fora, lets say have one now and then an election annually. This would make sure that each individual is prepared to donate the time for them to fulfil their function correctly. And this would also prevent dicriminatory editing and removal of posts purely on a personal basis of dislike of one's views on a topic.Obviously this would be less appropriate for an unregistered forum, but I think it is worth a try to ensure these fora justify their purpose.

[Kevin_Rye]

its 'people' like you kevin that create the need for moderation and censorship by constantly seeking attention with slanderous and biased posts...

 

>>Yes, Unc.

 

I also think that given your highly paid position at supporters trust you should not really be using these forums for your rhetoric...most posters/fans on here are unpaid for their hard work and efforts whilst you are highly paid by the taxpayers ultimately to do a job in non league football and I doubt your professional remit includes spouting bollox on forums...

 

>>First of all, it's Supporters Direct, and as for highly paid? You clearly don't bother with research do you. And we're not funded by tax. As I told you in the response to the posts about the FSIF, they are funded by the authorities. Until April next year when that deal kicks in, we're funded by Sport England, which comes from Lottery Money. But then, hey, I'm getting used to that lack of attentiveness and research from you. As for the people who do all the hardwork at non-league clubs, I couldn't agree more. That's why I think that one person or a handful of people shouldn't be able to have total control over the destiny of the club they work so hard for or support. You, however, don't agree, and think that it's perfectly acceptable, and you don't like anyone who disagrees with you.

 

That's where we differ Unc, and you've just shone a spotlight on the difference once again. Keep at it!

[Uncle Urchin]

Quote:

Kevin_Rye said:
And we're not funded by tax. As I told you in the response to the posts about the FSIF, they are funded by the authorities. Until April next year when that deal kicks in, we're funded by Sport England, which comes from Lottery Money.

ah right....so can you confirm that all of the sport england money comes from the lottery or is it match funded by the tax payer....either way..even if it was all lottery money (which it aint) it therefore comes from people who support hundreds of different clubs and hold many views on politics and ownership....

and yet you use your highly paid position (can you confirm or otherwise please as to whether you get paid by supporters direct..?) to preach your own personal doctrines on fans football forums and abuse and slander members of other clubs...(sometimes unregistered)

and can you also confirm to us fans please the position with grants from your SD organisation to AFCW ....your own club...

thank you...

oh....and yes I will certainly 'keep it up' kevin...

your transparency is quite alarming...an in depth study of your activities is ongoing.....I didn't think you'd mind as you were so pleased to do an in depth study into mine 3 years ago.....

my revellations however will not be gleaned from the daily mirror... <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

ta ta... <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/bootyshake.gif" alt="" />

[Rick the Dick]

Quote:

As I told you in the response to the posts about the FSIF, they are funded by the authorities. Until April next year when that deal kicks in, we're funded by Sport England, which comes from Lottery Money.

 

Kevin, I've responded on the other thread to this.

[Uncle Urchin]

Quote:

Rick the Dick said:

Quote:

As I told you in the response to the posts about the FSIF, they are funded by the authorities. Until April next year when that deal kicks in, we're funded by Sport England, which comes from Lottery Money.

Kevin, I've responded on the other thread to this.

a deafening silence ensued... <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />