Jump to content

Adverts are hidden for all 'Gold Members' - sign up for just £10 a year by clicking here | Advertise here for just 25p per 1,000 impressions - click here
Welcome to Fans Focus. You are currently viewing as a guest. Please login or register to post.    

Sign in icon Sign In Register Register Help Help Login with Facebook Login with Twitter

League section covering 2,000+ clubs - check out your division and club page click here!

Recent Topics

Recent Status Updates
(Update your status via the dropdown
to the right of your name (top left))

View All Updates

Upcoming Calendar Events

There are no forthcoming calendar events

Today's Birthdays ( 17-July 18 )

  • Photo

    Age: 56

  • Photo

    Age: 56

  • Photo

    Age: 35

  • Photo

    Age: 62

  • Photo

    Age: 28

  • Photo

    Age: 60

  • Photo

    Age: 49

  • Photo

    Age: 41

  • Photo

    Age: 31

  • Photo

    Age: 50

  • Photo
    Stephen Cornwell

    Age: 60

  • Photo

    Age: --


Interesting Article

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
regular view basic view
3 replies to this topic

offline ronin

  • First XI - Permanent
  • Posts: 2,963
  • Joined: 14 Sep 2001
I saw a link to this article on the Ryman Isthmian fans forum and i think given our pre-season meetings it makes very interesting reading.

'When lives are being threatened, football isn't fun any more'

Hatred, antipathy and even death threats - what it's really like to be a committee member of a club's supporters' trust.

Guardian UnlimitedOctober 23, 2006 02:42 PM

When I was little, Saturdays were the highlight of my week. My dad and I would leave our house at 1.30pm, with me all bundled up - even in the spring. We'd buy sweets from the confectioner's, and I'd scurry to keep up as we headed to the ground. I'd get a programme and would carefully remove the staples from the middle so I could put the poster of the featured player on my wall later. Whatever the result, I'd be looking forward to next time.

More than 20 years on, I dread match-days. My innocence has been shattered by my bitter experience of football from the inside. Since becoming a part-owner of my club - as part of a supporters' trust - I've come to realise that football fans can be lazy, ungrateful and downright nasty.

The idea of supporters' trusts is a sound one: it allows fans to have a democratic say in the running of their club. There are now over 100 supporters' trusts across England, Wales and Scotland, with 61 holding equity within their clubs and four League clubs - Brentford, Chesterfield, Rushden & Diamonds and Stockport County - being run outright by supporters. The admirable Supporters Direct has also saved some clubs from severe financial straits - 13 by their reckoning. However, in the four years since I became a prominent trust committee member of my club, there has been far more frustration than elation.

You'll notice I haven't mentioned my team. That's because I'm too afraid to.

Like all trustees, I got involved in my club because I loved it and wanted what was best for it. Since then, however, I've been subject to accusatory howls from other fans of slanderous charges of corruption and nepotism, freeloading (merely for being seen at the club) and lying (whenever someone doesn't like what you're saying). Some trustees have been threatened with violence and even death. I know because I'm one of them.

The club don't always do things the trust agrees with. Yet it's the trust, and the trust board members personally, who take the flak for unpopular decision. "You should be doing more," is the gist of most of them - although there's usually a swear word or two thrown in - yet most fans don't realise we don't have much day-to-day influence. Our only strength lies in numbers, and our membership is dwindling as the crisis that created fan unity fades into history.

And our club is far from alone. Take trust-owned Stockport County - their ticket prices have been criticised by fans, but how else will they make any cash? Even at AFC Wimbledon, a fine example of fan democracy in action, there's been unrest amongst the supporters. Still, if anyone thinks they can do a better job, they're welcome to try. The democratic structure of a trust means that the membership's opinions are gauged on crucial matters, and the yearly elections mean that any member can stand for the committee and get involved.

That doesn't happen. Lazy fans sit back and wait for someone else to do all the leg-work, then they gleefully criticise. Most fans only like democracy when it works in their favour. As in any ballot, only those who vote get their voices heard. To sit back, revelling in apathy, and then boast about your commitment to the principles of the silent majority isn't good enough.

I've never met anyone involved in the trust movement who hasn't been hard-working and conscientious, with their club's interests entirely at heart. That's why our trust board now consists solely of old-stagers who have been there from the start, people who couldn't take the guilt if they resigned now and the trust folded. Three-quarters of us have season tickets we don't use because it's not particularly enjoyable to spend your Saturday trekking to a stadium where you have to put up with all kinds of abuse from the people who are supposed to be on your side.

It's easy to mouth off about how things would be if you were in charge. It's much more of a challenge to work within a society's rules, to broker and maintain a good relationship with club directors and staff, to fund community development projects, to feed back to fans on sensitive matters while preserving confidentiality - all at the same time as balancing your family life and full-time job.

It can be rewarding, but is it worth it? When the majority of football supporters are happy to abdicate responsibility for the love of their lives to faceless businessmen, can supporter ownership in this country ever truly succeed? When lives are being threatened and football isn't fun any more, the question must be asked - is any club worth this hassle? Right now, I'm not sure it is.

offline Eastside Urchin

Eastside Urchin
  • President Elect
  • rank
  • Posts: 46,437
  • Joined: 9 Sep 2009
  • Location: Hornchurch
  • Supports: AFC Hornchurch
  • Foes: Romford
the problem is it is a romantic notion that fans should take over a football club but as seen on so many occassions there are always some fans who feel they are better than other fans of the same club and once they feel like they have power then they will use it to for their own means.In all honesty it is much better to just be a fan and if you want to help your club out then thats fine but it is probably best to leave the running of the club to the owners and the fans concentrate on supporting the team

offline ronin

  • First XI - Permanent
  • Posts: 2,963
  • Joined: 14 Sep 2001
I agree with you. After reading the Exeter and York forums over the last couple of seasons i wouldn`t be suprised if the article was written by a fan of either club.

offline pabird

  • First XI - Permanent
  • Posts: 2,981
  • Joined: 9 May 2002
Lot of "could happen" in the article, football harbours many so called fans that are there simply to off-load their bile and never have a positive comment to make, why not? Simple really to be positive you have to understand what is happening and why and that takes an element of intelligence and judgement.
Substantial clubs will depend in rarely more than five people who do all the legwork and ulcer growing.
The winnings for those five are rare but very rewarding at each victory niche along the way and long may they prosper for without them there is no non-league football

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

View New Posts

List of all CLUBS on Fans Focus