Jump to content
Welcome to the new software - Please read! Read more... ×
Fans Focus - Non League football clubs
Sign in to follow this  
zody

can anyone answer this, many have tried and many have failed, how about you

Recommended Posts

This is the American government we are talking about. The first thing you have to remember are the words 'conspiracy' and 'coverup'. There have been both from day one. It doesn't matter if something is real or a hoax, there is going to be something not quite right in the way the facts are presented to the world.

 

Also, it depends on what website you go to. The conspiracy theory people are going to design their site one way, and the ones who are giving the facts are going to show things in a different light. We may never know the real truth of what happened that day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only cover up is that the American government knew something big was going to happen and have yet to admit, at least from what I've read on the subject - apparently Dick Cheney was in charge of a NORAD operation which involved the same sort of thing that happened on 9/11... on 9/11.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And JFK was shot and killed by Lee Harvey Oswald on his own ??

 

 

YEAH - RIGHT !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ah they've proved that one man did it (I think the discovery channel re-enacted it and got the magic bullet theory to work) but as to whether people on the inside knew, who knows that's why we keep talking about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Nibbler said:
ah they've proved that one man did it (I think the discovery channel re-enacted it and got the magic bullet theory to work) but as to whether people on the inside knew, who knows that's why we keep talking about it.


Proved, is the contentious word here. there is now a theory that the final shot came from a storm drain opening, in front of the grassy knoll. There is "proof" of this, as the trajectory of the shot was upwards!

Like any re-inactment, it tends to "prove" exactly what the people are looking for, that make the programmes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would the purpose of the cover up be exactly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Martin said:
What would the purpose of the cover up be exactly?
.....

............. Now that would depend on exactly WHO organised the killing, if it WAS an organised hit !

CIA ?

FBI ?

The Cubans ?

The Mob ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Nibbler said:
i only repeated what I read on a forum somewhere, and if it was one bullet which killed JFK you couldn't replicate it perfectly even if you tried


indeed they showed how it happend on Red Dwarf grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Big JR I was referring more about the plane than JFK. It seems a bit to neat to me that JFK was shot by a lone gunman who was miraculously then allowed to be killed himself. A cover up to some degree - almost certainly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said, there have been coverups since the beginning of the US government. There is no way possible JFK was shot by one bullet. There have been numerous reports of the fact the CIA did it, and reports the mafia did it. We may never know.

 

Quote:
What would the purpose of the cover up be exactly?

Possibly because our own government might have done it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

But why would the US Govt. do that??? The suicide bombers had a motive, why is it so difficult to believe that some people just don't like America and it's foreign policies, particularly in the Middle East?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess the theory is that the plane alleged to have flown into the Pentagon was shot down elsewhere and that a cover up was to blow a hole in a largely unoccupied section of the Pentagon. It would seem unnecessary to me because given the circumstances any action to shoot down hijacked aircraft would surely have been justified.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that wouldn't explain all the bits of jumbo jet that were lying around the pentagon and inside the impact zone, an impact zone which was approx. as wide as a jumbo jet, but I say we let the conspiracy nuts (you're not Martin) keep running with their looneyness

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When we were watching coverage the night of the attacks, we saw the wreckage bits all over the place by the Pentagon. It wouldn't matter if the section it was flown into was occupied or not, it still made a statement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't actually think it was a cover up I hasten to add.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dunno if this one was a cover-up or not, but as we were watching footage that day, we did see the plane debris. I do know the US government is not above covering things up, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how can it be a cover up when you think about it logically? A fully loaded jumbo flying full speed into one of the most reinforced structures in the world isn't going to leave a lot of debris, but its still there in that picture above

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×