Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support Fans Focus by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Feeder Club

OldTowner

By OldTowner
in Not the ETFC Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

OldTowner Enthusiast

OldTowner

Posted
Posted

 

Are Town now the feeder Club for Boro ?

 

I see that Broxbourne Borough have recently signed 2 of our rising starts.

Plus Max is there on a 3 month loan.

According to the Brox info these are "permanent" signings :-

Freddie Dooling and Robbie Carroll.

Both players have been with Town thro the youth set up and it seems a bit short sighted to let them go.

 

Out on Loan - Yes, no problem, but permanent? Why.

Whilst they may not be under any form of Contract to Town is there no way we can keep these type of youth Players registered ?

 

Surely these Players are the future of the Club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steph Contributor

Steph

Posted
Posted

I read in the observer yesterday about this 20 year old chelsea player out on loan to wolves and in the squad for the international on Wednesday. He said and I quote,

 

"I've been at Chelsea since I was 8: I love it, but I have two world class centre halves in front of me and I have to think about my future . How long do I wait?"

 

Now there is nothing wrong with ambition however at 20 he has not got the experience to command a first team place in the heart of a premiership defence. If Chelsea can not keep their young players what chance Enfield Town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldTowner Enthusiast

OldTowner

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Originally Posted By: Steph
I read in the observer yesterday about this 20 year old chelsea player out on loan to wolves and in the squad for the international on Wednesday. He said and I quote,

"I've been at Chelsea since I was 8: I love it, but I have two world class centre halves in front of me and I have to think about my future . How long do I wait?"

Now there is nothing wrong with ambition however at 20 he has not got the experience to command a first team place in the heart of a premiership defence. If Chelsea can not keep their young players what chance Enfield Town.



Agreed and we cannot compare the Clubs in any way what-so-ever.
However, my point is still valid.
Chelsea's Mancienne is ON LONE at Wolves ( not released ).
At the end of the Lone period he will return to his Parent Club.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr Happy Explorer

Mr Happy

Posted
Posted

Difference is that Chelsea have him under contract. Clubs of our size cannot afford to have all ploayers under contract and that then allows free agents to be approached at any time. If they are regitstered with a club then all other clubs have to do is put in a 7 day approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Father Jack Enthusiast

Father Jack

Posted
Posted

I believe that non-contract players can be dual registered at clubs at different levels of the pyramid. This may therefore be why Fred's move is described as 'permanent'. By contrast Max, as a contracted player, has to move to Broxbourne on loan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
andyetfc Collaborator

andyetfc

Posted
Posted
Originally Posted By: OldTowner

Are Town now the feeder Club for Boro ?

I see that Broxbourne Borough have recently signed 2 of our rising starts.
Plus Max is there on a 3 month loan.
According to the Brox info these are "permanent" signings :-
Freddie Dooling and Robbie Carroll.
Both players have been with Town thro the youth set up and it seems a bit short sighted to let them go.

Out on Loan - Yes, no problem, but permanent? Why.
Whilst they may not be under any form of Contract to Town is there no way we can keep these type of youth Players registered ?

Surely these Players are the future of the Club.


Or are Broxbourne Borough becoming a feeder club for the Town?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lovely stuff Enthusiast

lovely stuff

Posted
Posted
Originally Posted By: Mr Happy
I agree re Woodgate. However, until King can prove that he can play week in and week out for his club he will not risk furthering his injury woes playing for England.


Saying that,most England players have proved this week that they can't play game in/game out for England.Just look at the usual injury drop out rate.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Father Jack Enthusiast

Father Jack

Posted
Posted
Originally Posted By: lovely stuff
[saying that,most England players have proved this week that they can't play game in/game out for England.Just look at the usual injury drop out rate.


While King and Woodgate have proved that they can't play game in/game out for Tottenham
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Out_Of_Towner Rookie

Out_Of_Towner

Posted
Posted
Originally Posted By: lovely stuff
PS..How do J.Lescott/C.Davis/Mancienne get picked in preference to the likes of L.King/J.Woodgate for the England centre back positions. doah
Did you not see match of the day on saturday night . King and Woodgate's performance's was appalling at Fulham. It could have been a bigger defeat as well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...