Jump to content
Fans Focus - Non League football clubs

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The Sun is a disgrace,how they still manage to pull in readers is beyond me.....although it does go to show the amount of total idiots who read that rag in this country   I would t mind betting tho

Who gives a sh*t. Waste of space the lot.

I would keep the monarchy,they are a very important part of our country & union. The rest i would tell to jog on but our capital city is full of history and getting rid of this by getting rid of

He has tried to reduce the CO2 'cost' of running his 39 year old Aston by using fuel made from wine!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 years later...

When do we think that Charles will finally become King, I believe he's 64 this year and the Queen is likely to live for another ten years at least

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Missunderstood, do you really think this nation could have a grown up debate over the monarchy ?

I think not, especially when there are cynical, anti-establshment people around like you about.

True, the whole civil list should be abolished apart from the top levels, but HM Queen is a very nice lady & has been a remarkable servant to the commonwealth. I also think Princes Charles & William would be fine leaders for our proud nation.

Happy St.Georges Day

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why destroy part of this country's heritage & tradition because some people can't stand people with wealth & stature

 

Because some of us would prefer to live in a more forward looking progressive country that distributes wealth and stature more evenly, and doesn't wish to live in a feudal past that most other nations deemed unnecessary decades ago

 

. IMO its ridiculous that anyone can become a head of state purely because of an outdated birthright that refuses to take into account any suitability for the task.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It still amazes me that people who survive by their own labour and wits in this age feel the need to lickspittle up to these parasites. They talk about heritage and tradition as if they'd forgotten that if we kept every aspect of centuries old "tradition" they'd still be required to drop everything in their lives, their responsibilities to family, their livelihood, their belongings and march off to war without a moments notice to further these parasites whims. It's bad enough that these leeches live off our taxes when centuries of our ancestors have made them already fabulously wealthy that they feel the need to still tug the forelock. Let's see how they feel when their daughters marry the man they love and their "king" gets first dabbles eh?

 

Start with the House of Lords, throw these people out on their ar$es.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would keep the monarchy,they are a very important part of our country & union.

The rest i would tell to jog on but our capital city is full of history and getting rid of this by getting rid of the monarchy would probably end up having a negative effect on our economy.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...

Incdredibly Prince Charles has turned down the opportunity to watch Jessica Ennis's bid to win gold on Saturday, instead he will be judging, wait for it, a tug of war competition at the Highland Games in Caithness near John O'Groats.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good on Prince Charles, got a lot of time for the Monarchy. Yes, they cost the taxpayer but they also bring a LOT of money in to the country.

 

Would you really want President 'Call Me Dave'? I certainly know that I wouldn't!

 

If we're going to talk about saving money, we can look at quitting the EU for a start...

Link to post
Share on other sites

AdamKing - I didn't say that I haven't got time for the Monarchy, I'm just saying that it's the Olympic Games in London for goodness sake and our future King can't even be bothered to attend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, can't be bothered to attend or he already has a prior engagement with the staff at the Highland Games?

 

I would suspect it's the latter - Prince Charles is a big fan and supporter of the Highland Games, and his 'booking' there must have been a long-standing obligation.

 

Besides, there are more than enough members of the Royal Family represented there so it's no big deal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Prince Charles has known for about seven years that the Olympic Games were taking place this summer so could have made sure there wouldn't be a clash with the Highland Games to avoid an embarrassment such as this. I'm not 'Call Me Dave's' biggest fan but at least he has attended events, as has 'figure of fun' Boris Johnson, and not shyed away using every excuse in the book not to be there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rhodes, how is it an embarrassment?

 

HM Queen Elizabeth II, Princess Anne, Prince William etc. have all been there, so what difference does it make if Charles and Camilla aren't there?

 

Besides, it's Prince Charles' choice, and if you read up on his reason to attend the Highland Games over the Olympics it is because he wants to keep the memory of his Grandmother (the Queen Mother) alive. I, for one, respect his decision to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but where would you rather be, the Olympic Stadium in Stratford watching the greatest show on earth in your home city or hundreds of miles away in bleak John O'Groats with a load of 'sweaty socks' watching tug of war and tossing the caber

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather be in Gloucester this weekend :) There'll probably be an exhibition of sorts on at the Docks.

 

I can't stand crowds (unless football or rugby) and I hate queues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Prince Charles- A fool born with a Fools Face. A man who sent a text wishing to be a Tampax. A jug eared idiot who wished to be a females bicycle seat.

The Queen- Her ancestors stole the land and the wealth from the country.

Rhodes- A idiot of the highest degree who spends his days brown nosing anyone he thinks is superior to him. PS please remove your snout from my Anal Canal.

Edited by Pink Panther
Link to post
Share on other sites

Pink Panther - I think that's a bit harsh on Prince Charles but I can see where you're coming from, he certainly doesn't do himself any favours at times does he

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are correct on this one Mr Rhoades. I have been a bit harsh on old Charlie. After all, i for one would not mind using my face to be Pippa Middletons bike seat.Unlike Charlies choice of Camilla parker Bowles. lets 'FACE'it, a hour under that and you would come up smelling like Billingsgate Fish market in a heatwave.

Edited by Pink Panther
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you'll find that Camilla prefers to be on top - she has Charlie's lugholes to hold onto ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Talking of Camilla, to be fair and to her credit she has always taken a back seat hasn't she and knows that she can never take Princess Diana's place

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...